Skip to content

Conversation

@codedoga
Copy link

This PR should improve comparison of Dokploy with Caprover:

@codedoga codedoga requested a review from Siumauricio as a code owner July 21, 2025 19:36
@codedoga codedoga changed the title Update comparison.mdx - fix Caprover features docs: Update comparison.mdx - fix Caprover features Jul 21, 2025
@Siumauricio
Copy link
Contributor

The integration of gitlab and bitbucket is something totally different from the way dokploy and caprover are integrated,

Dokploy offers something dedicated that offers you autocompletion of repositories and branches, using oauth apps.

Instead caprover does authentication via ssh which is a manual process for each repository, i.e. this method in dokploy is known as git provider which we also support, so they are 2 different things.

The backups, if I see that recently I will add it✅

Volume backups are something different, dokploy has a dedicated interface for that, but using a template is not the same as using something dedicated that uses the software itself.

@codedoga
Copy link
Author

The integration of gitlab and bitbucket is something totally different from the way dokploy and caprover are integrated,

Dokploy offers something dedicated that offers you autocompletion of repositories and branches, using oauth apps.

Instead caprover does authentication via ssh which is a manual process for each repository, i.e. this method in dokploy is known as git provider which we also support, so they are 2 different things.

In that case you need asterisk symbol next to all of those "integrations" to explain what was meant to be said. Otherwise it's very misleading and for someone without prior experience with Coolify, Dokku or Caprover it looks like there is no built-in way of deploying from those VCSs.

Updated integration support details for Bitbucket, Gitlab, and Gitea.
@codedoga codedoga requested a review from Siumauricio October 19, 2025 17:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants